6 results for 'cat:"Trade Secrets" AND cat:"Damages" AND cat:"Contract"'.
J. Garcia finds that the lower court properly granted no-evidence summary judgment in favor of the appellees on the clinical pharmacy's claims for misappropriation of trade secrets, tortious interference and breach of contract. Contrary to the pharmacy's argument on appeal, the time allowed for discovery was adequate. Also, the pharmacy failed to show that it suffered damages in support of its breach of contract claim against its former employee. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Garcia, Filed On: May 16, 2024, Case #: 05-22-01276-CV, Categories: trade Secrets, damages, contract
[Consolidated.] J. Brody finds that one of two trial courts hearing aspects of the same dispute over allegedly poached employees and trade secrets abused its discretion when it increased an award from $1 million to $2.3 million, as the award was not the result of passion or prejudice, and its injunctive order was overly broad. The second trial court properly held that the preliminary injunction was overly broad and unenforceable since it restrained lawful conduct. Reversed in part.
Court: Idaho Supreme Court, Judge: Brody, Filed On: February 2, 2024, Case #: 49418, Categories: trade Secrets, damages, Interference With contract
J. Mays finds the trial court properly awarded the landscaping company more than $62,000 in damages for side work performed by the former employee while he was still employed. The employee's claim he only took on jobs the company could not handle was rebutted by a coworker's testimony the company was willing and able to complete all of the jobs the employee turned down so he could do the work on his own. Affirmed.
Court: Ohio Court Of Appeals, Judge: Mays, Filed On: January 11, 2024, Case #: 2024-Ohio-73, Categories: trade Secrets, damages, contract
J. Williams grants summary judgment on five claims related to an injectable, anatomically correct simulated face model because the potential buyer did not misappropriate trade secrets or infringe related patents and trade dress by developing its own face model after the parties had a falling out. Damages for breach of contract should be denied because the contract had no bearing on a prior failed deal.
Court: USDC Delaware, Judge: Williams, Filed On: October 6, 2023, Case #: 1:19cv592, NOS: Patent - Property Rights, Categories: trade Secrets, damages, contract
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Sargus denies, in part, the former loan company employees' motion for summary judgment, ruling the loan company's evidence of credit pulls and loan documents the employees took with them to a competitor is sufficient to create an issue of fact and allow the tortious interference claim to go to a jury. Meanwhile, because none of the emails used to support the unfair competition claim include the names of both the loan company and the competitor, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim, and that portion of the employees' motion will be granted.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Sargus, Filed On: July 17, 2023, Case #: 2:21cv5922, NOS: Defend Trade Secrets Act of 2016 (DTSA) - Property Rights, Categories: trade Secrets, damages, Interference With contract